A dripped data discloses the individual communications that OpenAI is tracking, including just how often ChatGPT screens author links and how couple of individuals really click them.

By the numbers. ChatGPT shows web links, but barely any person clicks on them. For one top-performing page, the OpenAI file reports:

• 610, 775 total link impacts
• 4, 238 complete clicks
• 0. 69 % overall CTR
• Finest specific page CTR: 1 68 %
• Many various other web pages: 0. 01 %, 0. 1 % , 0%

ChatGPT metrics. The dripped file breaks down every area ChatGPT presents links and how customers communicate with them. It tracks:

• Day array ( date dividers, record month, min/max report dates)
• Publisher and link information ( author name, base URL, host, link ranking)
• Impressions and clicks across:
  • Action
  • Sidebar
  • Citations
  • Search results
  • TL; DR
  • Rapid navigating
• CTR calculations for each and every display screen area
• Overall impacts and overall clicks throughout all surface areas

Where the web links show up. Remarkably, the most noticeable placements drive the fewest clicks. The record broke down efficiency by area:

• Key response: Big impacts, tiny CTR
• Sidebar and citations: Less impacts, greater CTR (6– 10 %)
• Search engine result: Almost no impressions, absolutely no clicks

Why we care. Really hoping ChatGPT presence might change your lost Google natural search website traffic? This information states no. AI-driven traffic is climbing, but it’s still a bit of overall website traffic — and it’s unlikely to ever before behave like typical organic search web traffic.

Concerning the data. It was shared on LinkedIn by Vincent Terrasi , CTO and founder of Draft & Goal, which bills itself as “a multistep operations to scale your web content manufacturing.”